Participating Physicians Kenneth R. This is a review and evaluation of medical and public literature regarding the reported emotional and psychological effects of participation in physician-assisted suicide PAS and euthanasia on the involved physicians. Articles in medical journals, legislative investigations and the public press were obtained and reviewed to determine what has been reported regarding the effects on physicians who have been personally involved in PAS and euthanasia.
Throughout that period of time she was faced with the very real possibility of a year prison sentence 14 for each offense. This case was an illustration of the flagrant injustices and human cruelty that are embraced by the Canadian Criminal Code section b: Every one who a counsels a person to commit suicide, or b aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
This Euthanasia assisted suicide assumes that any sort of help in assisting a suicide is based upon malice. This assumption is almost always false — most instances of wanting to help end lives come from human compassion for the suffering.
And rare cases where malice might be involved — where grandma is being urged to end her life so that family members can more quickly get the inheritance — could easily be caught and avoided by an independent screening process as part of a process of legalized, physician-assisted suicide.
Section b is unjust because it not only leads to prosecution for acts of compassion, it is cruel because it presents a major societal obstacle to showing mercy to the most wretched among us. Most Canadians want this law changed, and it is time something was done about it.
There have been a number of private members bills on this matter brought to the Canadian parliament, but none have gone anywhere. These are mentioned in the Latimer book. The Latimer case, involving non-consensual euthanasia, is a much more difficult one to deal with in legislation.
Can ending the life of a person who is unable to give consent ever be justified?
But what about Tracy? What about others who like Tracy were never able to speak, or those who descend into hopeless, morbid, terminal disease and lose the ability to give consent? Are such people to be excluded from the mercy we would show, indeed demand, for any other similarly-afflicted creature?
A review of international law on assisted suicide and euthanasia is given in the Latimer book so will not be repeated here, except to say that Canada falls well behind a number of other jurisdictions in this regard.
The Netherlands and Belgium also allow euthanasia, where by a physician may directly administer a lethal injection.
Switzerland is the only jurisdiction that will provide assisted suicide to non-residents. Of the various possibilities for new legislation the least controversial would be to permit physician-assisted suicide specifically for terminally ill patients, as is the case in the three American states.
The provision of even this minimal service would meet the needs of many dying people who want to take some control over what is about to happen to them. This would prevent not only some highly unpleasant and prolonged dying processes, something many people dread much more than dying, but it also help avoid both grisly deaths —such as shooting oneself — and bungled attempts at suicide.
The latter sometimes leave a person in worse condition than before, perhaps with brain damage. The availability of physician-assisted suicide would provide peace of mind to many dying people, some of whom, as has happened in the three American states, would never actually find it necessary to resort to taking the drugs.a website to discuss ethical and legal questions related to the issues of assisted suicide and euthanasia, in particular as it pertains to Canadian law.
FINAL EXIT The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying by Derek Humphry Revised 3rd edition (April printing) $17 + shipping.
Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is when action is taken to end the life of a person who is experiencing long-term illness.
Euthanasia is against the law in many countries, and in the U.S. Euthanasia or assisted suicide—and sometimes both—have been legalized in a small number of countries and states.
|Euthanasia and assisted suicide||Euthanasia Factsincluding graphs of data on people who attempted suicide, facts sheets, FAQs, debate points, books, videos etc.|
|However, they are different and, in the law, they are treated differently.|
In all jurisdictions, laws and safeguards were put in place to prevent abuse and misuse of these practices. Prevention measures have included, among others, explicit consent by the.
EUTHANASIA FACTS. THE BASICS. Euthanasia Definitions (PowerPoint File). Quick List: Euthanasia Pros and Cons.
Arguments Against Euthanasia (PowerPoint File). Reasons for Euthanasia (PowerPoint File). Quotations on Euthanasia (PowerPoint File). History of Euthanasia (PowerPoint File) History of Assisted Suicide in England and the US (13th through 20th Century). Assisted suicide is suicide committed with the aid of another person, sometimes a physician.
The term is often used interchangeably with physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which involves a doctor "knowingly and intentionally providing a person with the knowledge or means or both required to commit suicide, including counseling about lethal doses of drugs, prescribing such lethal doses or.